Transcript
Records formal study, courses, grades and academic progression under institutional governance.
Institution-led learner records
Connect degrees, certificates, badges, skills, competencies, projects and experiences into a structured learner record while preserving the institution as the source of each achievement.
Courses, grades and formal academic progression.
Related learning, credentials, skills and experiences in context.
A CLR complements the authoritative academic transcript. It does not replace it.
A connected institutional record
A Comprehensive Learner Record (CLR) brings a learner’s achievements together in a structured digital record. It connects the context around learning—from academic milestones to credentials and applied experience—while preserving the institution or organisation responsible for each achievement.
For institutions, the CLR provides a way to represent more of recognised learning without changing the authority of the underlying academic record.
Two records, distinct roles
The transcript remains the authoritative academic record. The CLR adds a broader view of learning and achievement around it.
Records formal study, courses, grades and academic progression under institutional governance.
Connects the transcript’s academic milestones with credentials, skills, projects and other achievements.
A CLR complements the authoritative academic transcript. It does not replace it.
A richer picture of achievement
Institutions can bring different kinds of achievement into one connected record. Each contribution retains its own source and context.
Degrees, courses and formal learning milestones.
Certificates, digital badges and micro-credentials.
Capabilities connected to learning outcomes or achievement evidence.
Applied learning, placements and other documented experiences.
Build the connected record
Select a component to explore its source, evidence and place in a Comprehensive Learner Record.
Source: awarding institution. Evidence context: academic award and associated transcript record.
Source: certificate issuer. Evidence context: credential criteria and achievement record.
Source: badge issuer. Evidence context: badge criteria and linked evidence.
Source: institution. Evidence context: reviewed outcome, assessment or credential; framework definitions retain their source.
Source: documenting institution or partner. Evidence context: project evidence and learning outcomes.
Source: institution, employer or placement partner. Evidence context: experience record and related learning.
Connected record
Degree
An institution-issued degree contributes a formal academic achievement, retaining the awarding institution and the qualification context.
Source: awarding institution · Evidence context: academic award and associated transcript recordCredentials as components
Credential infrastructure creates and verifies eligible achievements. A CLR can then connect those credentials with related learning and other achievements, keeping issuer and evidence context attached to each component.
Explore Digital Credential InfrastructureSkills in context
Skills are more meaningful when connected to the achievements and evidence that support them. An institution can map and review capabilities against its own learning outcomes, credentials and frameworks; the CLR preserves those relationships in context.
Explore Skills Taxonomy MappingLearning beyond the classroom
Projects, placements and work-based learning can add useful context to academic and credential achievements. Where an institution or partner records these experiences, the CLR can connect them to the source, evidence and learning they represent.
Source and evidence stay visible
Connecting achievements should not erase where they came from. Issuer, evidence and available status information provide context for understanding a component; verification depends on the source and the checks supported for that credential.
Retain the institution or organisation responsible for the achievement.
Keep relevant assessment, criteria or evidence context associated with the achievement.
Use available credential status and issuer information when verification is needed.
Interoperable record formats
CLR 2.0 structures connected achievement records. Open Badges 3.0 represents individual badge achievements, and the W3C Verifiable Credentials model provides a foundation for verifiable claims. These formats support record exchange while each component retains its issuer and evidence context.
Institutional oversight
Institutions and professional bodies define which achievements belong in a record, who may issue them, and how evidence and access are governed. Academic authority stays with the institution; professional standards and credential status stay with their issuing body.
Set the record scope around institutional priorities and recognised learning.
Establish issuing authority for each achievement and credential.
Govern evidence and access in line with institutional policy.
From achievement to connected record
Three distinct roles connect infrastructure, the record and the learner experience.
CertifyMe Credential Infrastructure supports achievement issuance and verification.
Digital Credential InfrastructureThe Comprehensive Learner Record brings achievements together with their source and context.
The Skill Passport gives learners a place to view and share their connected record.
Explore Skill PassportInstitutional insight
When achievement records are connected to institutional skills frameworks, Workforce Intelligence can help institutions examine learning and capability information in a broader workforce context. It is a distinct use of structured data, not a replacement for the CLR or the learner-facing Skill Passport.
Explore Workforce IntelligenceCommon questions
A Comprehensive Learner Record (CLR) is a structured digital record that can bring together learning achievements, credentials, skills, competencies and other milestones. The 1EdTech CLR Standard defines an interoperable format for these records.
CLR stands for Comprehensive Learner Record.
A CLR platform helps institutions bring achievement and credential information into structured digital learner records while retaining issuer and evidence context. Specific integrations, issue and exchange options depend on the implementation.
CLR 2.0 is a version of the 1EdTech Comprehensive Learner Record Standard. It specifies an interoperable format for representing a learner's achievements and uses the W3C Verifiable Credentials model; use of the standard alone does not verify a particular product or record.
A CLR complements the authoritative academic transcript. It does not replace it.
Depending on the implementation, it can represent degrees, courses, certificates, badges, skills, competencies, projects, experiences and employer-based achievements.
Yes. Open Badges can form part of a broader learner record when represented according to the applicable standards.
Credential Infrastructure creates and verifies achievements; a CLR connects those achievements into a broader record. Each credential's issuer, evidence and status should remain traceable.
Yes. Skills and competencies can be connected to the achievements and credentials that provide their context. Reviewed relationships preserve the institution's definitions and supporting evidence.
Not exactly. Learning and Employment Record (LER) is a broader category of records, while the 1EdTech CLR Standard is a particular technical specification for interoperable learner records.
The 1EdTech CLR 2.0 standard is based on the W3C Verifiable Credentials model. A specific product or record still needs to implement and validate the relevant standard.
Universities, colleges, professional bodies, training providers and other achievement issuers can use learner records to represent learning across different contexts.
A professional or chartered body can use the CLR model to connect certifications, competencies, continuing professional development and renewal milestones. The issuing body remains authoritative for its standards, assessment and credential status.
The CLR Standard supports achievements from multiple issuers. Each issuer and component achievement should retain its own provenance and verification context.
A broader record, institutionally governed
Bring credential, skills and experience sources into a conversation about your institution’s approach to connected learner records.